I needed a book to read so I picked up actor Ken Howard's (film The White Shadow et al) a week ago and have been enjoying it immensely lounging in my hammock. Every nice afternoon I unscroll it and lay outside, reading and annotating in pen every book I read. I'm still in the middle of Books of the Century, selections from 100 years of New York Times book reviews, but needed a change. I try to only read books, articles, news and blogs that will stimulate and inform, rather than just thrill like my Jason Bourne past favorites. I'm too old not to be discerning with my limited time.
 Anyway, Ken's book has and is enlightening, packed with real life examples of the points he makes, and 100% applicable to writers, despite being a book about speaking in public. Speaking in front of an audience is the number two fear of Americans, so as a would-be writer, hoping to do interviews, teach writing courses, sell my books and be a renaissance man, his words are ringing true on all levels. (The number one fear has become walking alone at night according to Time magazine's July 6 Double issue.) 
 If I find the time I'll write a companion book titled Write Natural because Act Natural has hundreds of parallels to good writing, and, mainly, good truth-telling. For Ken's main mantra is to be oneself, in no matter what "role" we inhabit: single, married, father, mother, worker, neighbor, leader, actor etc. And that to me, is the essence of good writing - being truthful about and to oneself. To act believably, is to be yourself, with preparational research as your foundation.
 To write what is believable, whether fiction or non, is to write well, and that means words chosen and actions shown must ring true. I have two shelves of writing, grammar and style books, and this will not be placed there when done. It's so good (if not a little wordy), it will remain my close companion in weekly travels while I absorb its wisdoms.
 Here's a few examples from the book, with my inserts in parenthesis to show its transferability to writing:
   "I will show you how a master singer (writer) like Sinatra (Rowling) also used his (her) body, head, and his (her) heart to reach an audience." (p.11)
 "For when everything works -- when the adrenaline, the words, and the charge from a satisfied audience all come together -- the result is an experience that even the most nonreligious actors (writers) ... can only describe as spiritual." (p. 22)
 "The Zone is within the reach of public speakers (writers) as well. (p. 23)
 "My aim is to help you develop an easygoing, conversational delivery (style)." (p. 36)
 "When you practice (write) alone, do it out loud. Trust me. I know it may seem a little strange at first, but it makes a big difference." (p. 43)
 Almost every page of Act Natural has clear, applicable points to aid any person become a better speaker, and any writer to become a better writer (if you read "writer" into his lines).
 by Rodney Richards, Authorpreneur, Author of Episodes, A poetic memoir, about experiencing bipolar; and facilitator of numerous writing classes.
 Act Natural is available on Amazon for $5.90 new, copyright 2003 Ken Howard, published by Random House
 
 
 
Here you will find resources, rules, tips and techniques for writing, editing, and publishing your best work
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Monday, July 6, 2015
Giving Away your Rights
Just a few words
every writer, author, blogger, publisher, or copier
must know:
"_____________ Company grants you
a limited, revocable, non-exclusive,
non-transferable license
to access and make personal,
non-commercial use of the (Material) or its content
and not to download
(other than page caching or unless otherwise allowed
by _______________ Company or permitted by law)
or modify all or any portion of the (Material)
and its content.
This license does not include any resale or
commercial use of the Material or its contents;"
Content is King these modern times, always has been
and it is not "free" although you'd never know
when you see company names
like Huff Post or Random House
and the writer's or author's name
even if "House editors"
and the article title
and date and time of pub
None of it is free
not even from my source of choice
Wikipedia
All require attribution, and/or a fee,
for you to use
unless a critic...
so criticize whatever you copy
is my advice
Add your opinion of it.
Speak your mind and heart
don't let it stand --
alone
If that is what you must do
to save your assets and not get sued
in this U.S. and worldwide society
litigious as in ubiquitous
all to make a buck
not from their content,
but from your auth or
unauthorized use of it
More money to be made
in that than the creation itself
for Content is King
and you won't get paid for it
but may get your name in print
for whatever that's worth...
every writer, author, blogger, publisher, or copier
must know:
"_____________ Company grants you
a limited, revocable, non-exclusive,
non-transferable license
to access and make personal,
non-commercial use of the (Material) or its content
and not to download
(other than page caching or unless otherwise allowed
by _______________ Company or permitted by law)
or modify all or any portion of the (Material)
and its content.
This license does not include any resale or
commercial use of the Material or its contents;"
Content is King these modern times, always has been
and it is not "free" although you'd never know
when you see company names
like Huff Post or Random House
and the writer's or author's name
even if "House editors"
and the article title
and date and time of pub
None of it is free
not even from my source of choice
Wikipedia
All require attribution, and/or a fee,
for you to use
unless a critic...
so criticize whatever you copy
is my advice
Add your opinion of it.
Speak your mind and heart
don't let it stand --
alone
If that is what you must do
to save your assets and not get sued
in this U.S. and worldwide society
litigious as in ubiquitous
all to make a buck
not from their content,
but from your auth or
unauthorized use of it
More money to be made
in that than the creation itself
for Content is King
and you won't get paid for it
but may get your name in print
for whatever that's worth...
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Asking Permission
Dick my boss told me decades ago
        "Easier to ask for forgiveness
              than for permission"
as we spent millions of 
     dollars of 
someone else's taxes
      without asking 
only telling
Today authors jobs 
       tough as nails
 'cause every word  or lyric's 
        been hashtagged before
and our job to twist them
         to make our own
With 17 million books 
       on Amazon today 
over 300k published new 
       annually
and that's just here
With tweets and captions and bon mots and sayings
       quips and quotes and sound bites galore
who could ever be sure
       it hasn't been said before
I can't
So Google is best bud, my pal, my friend
And when I find 
      words from someone else
I want to ask permission 
      really
But none tell you how 
      not even a tweet 
how to obtain 
       a Right to Use
so I can make a few bucks 
       using mostly mine 
and fewness of their's
Writing letters to the Editor
       the Times called and asked 
for sources –
       never did in past editions
Publishers and editors 
       demand the same
every one
       before they'll print 
commercially
When once found 
       these original sources 
only delay response
       perhaps emails back and forth
"How many words (do you intend to use)?
        and they have hidden magic price lists
they won't share
"Six bucks per copy 
       for 3,000 words."
And I don't know 
       if Mister King or 
only Simon & Shuster 
       keeps the dough
And the delay 
       rather than money 
kills the project
       unless self-published
So that's just what I'll do
       and to hell with you
who create deep bottomless
       hell pits
Sue my LLC if you 
         care too
Original prose poem by Rodney Richards 7-4-15
Author's note: Based on true stories
Playing Fair with Music Lyrics
There's only one way 
      to publish favorite lyrics
for money
      and that's critical review
according to Copyright Act
      section 107 
What's said and used must 
       be transformative 
not merely derivative
        according to U.S. courts
If changing Woo Hoo, woo hoo hoo 
        from the 5, 6, 7, 8s
to Wooo Whooo, Wooo Whooo 
        that's merely derivative 
But if saying "I never heard 
        such a stupid thing as Woo Hoo,"
that's opinion 
        which can't be challenged
Even tho 
        I've probably called it out 
once or twice hailing a friend 
        but women seem to do that 
more than men
        or is it "You Who?"
Whether publishing opinion 
       for commercial gain 
or not
So here goes, although 
       admitting I hate
criticizing popular music or
       classic rocks favorites
Don't like callin' out
       musicians and singers
they work hard and good 
        at what they write and sing and play
so deserve their 
        sweat from labors 
and box office proceeds
Sing along and hum and tap with
       Billy Joel and the 
       Beatles and 
Stones songs for three
Each free on MS Media Player
       every morn
But can't sell any, any, lyrics 
      to make money for me, 
that would be illegal 
      would get sued for sure
because record labels and Tom Petty 
       are ruthless
They sued Robin Thicke 
       and Pharrell Williams
just to name two who lost
       over three stupid notes
to "earn" free money for 
       lawyers and studios
Publishing one's exact words 
      a big "No no"
causing loss of assets 
      for sure 
as other writers horror stories 
      by Writers Beware shows
We're forced to ask some 
       unknown or most popular
author or publisher for 
       permission
Hard to get easily 
      for all the hullabaloo and
          woo hoo,
these assholes cause
Original prose poem by Rodney Richards 7-4-15
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)